
Now I’m going to
stop here and tell you that this is NOT a blog about
who is right or
who is wrong.
The back and forth discussion from other well known theists
like Dr. Robert Gagnon (yep, never heard of him either) are so far above my
head that I have to dissect each sentence, check a source, translate from
Greek, and sleep on it. I’m simply not
smart enough to understand the basis for most of their moral arguments.
What I did do, is took a giant step back and looked at the
lengthy banter over the position and the topic. I couldn’t help but think, “Why
is this so complicated?”

It reminded me of Jesus’ teaching in Luke 11 (also told in Matthew 23). Jesus gives a stern warning to the Pharisees when they are taken back because He breaks one of their laws by not washing His hands before they eat. He begins by saying:
“Now
then, you Pharisees clean the outside of the cup and dish, but inside you are
full of greed and wickedness. You foolish people! Did not the one
who made the outside make the inside also? But now as for what is inside you—be
generous to the poor, and everything will be clean for you.” Luke 11:39-41
Jesus goes on to blast the Pharisees about the laws and
rules they so vehemently follow; yet they (the Pharisees) miss the entire
point.
He addresses this in their giving:
“Woe
to you Pharisees, because you give God a tenth of your mint, rue and all other
kinds of garden herbs, but you neglect justice and the love of God. You should
have practiced the latter without leaving the former undone.” Luke 11:42
He addresses this in their position:
“Woe
to you Pharisees, because you love the most important seats in the synagogues
and respectful greetings in the marketplaces.” Luke 11:43
And one of the Pharisees so boldly replies:
“One
of the experts in the law answered him, “Teacher, when you say these things,
you insult us also.” Jesus replied, “And you experts in the law, woe to you,
because you load people down with burdens they can hardly carry, and you
yourselves will not lift one finger to help them.” Luke 11:45-46
I could keep going as Jesus continues to show them how they
themselves are slaves to the law, and eventually call them out; even referring
to them as a brood of vipers (Matthew 23) that cannot escape hell. OUCH! Read
it for yourself
Matthew 23. You should do this often.)
Jesus is blasting the Pharisees because they have gotten so
wrapped up their law, rules, elitism that they forget the what they were
created to do. The point is that God is
all about loving people, helping people, not about who knows the law
better. If we’re being honest, none of
the Pharisees (or any of us) could ever come close to following the Law of
Moses.
Jesus came to destroy that mindset by fulfilling the Law
(Matthew 5:17) and spoke that we are to love the Lord God with all our heart,
and love our neighbor as we love ourselves (Matthew 22:34-39).
When I see Christians destroying each other over whose sin
is worse, it troubles me.
“Yea but Mark Driscoll* did (insert his sin)”
“That (insert Sin #1) is not as bad as my (insert Sin #2).”
Let me break it to you now… All sin is bad. All sin separates you from God. Thankfully the blood that was shed on the cross, by Jesus Christ, the one and only person who could live perfectly under the Law of Moses, paid the price for my sin.
My past sin, the sin I have done today, and the sin I will do tomorrow.
It’s all paid for!
So is Mark Driscoll’s, the lady who had an abortion, a
serial killer, child molester, and your sin too, if you have truly accepted
Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior!
So to those who want to argue back and forth whether
homosexuals are accepted in the church and continue to frustrate each other in
your banter: You’re both trying to prove each other wrong and both have
excellent points throughout your arguments.
I’m going to focus on loving people. People the world says
are scumbags, and people that are easy to love. I do this because God does
this, Jesus did this, and I want to be more like Jesus in everything I do.
When nonbelievers see the Christian church treating our own
brothers and sisters In Christ with such harsh and vicious words, it’s no
wonder they don’t want to be a part of the church or listen to what the Bible
teaches.
My job is not to judge them, tell them how to live, or be
their voice of morality. I figure if I just love them, and show them the love
of Jesus Christ, He will handle the moral and ethical issues as He deems fit.
He did and continues to do this with me.
So I say to the homosexual, you are welcome at the church I
attend. You’re welcome to come and sit right next to me. I’ll save you a
seat. I’d love to meet you, get to know
you, and just be your friend. I’m not
better than you. My sin stinks just as bad as yours does.
I can accept you if you can accept me.
What would this world look like if we were as good at loving each other,
as we
are at judging each other?
*If you don’t know who Mark
Driscoll is, Google it, and read for yourself.
I’m not getting into specifics about that here. It has nothing to do
with homosexuality so don’t jump to conclusions. I do pray for him and love him
as a brother in Christ.
Back when Westerns were popular, one movie line stood out. "Shoot em all and let God sort them out." How about "Love them all and let Jesus sort them out." There's room at my church too. We're known for welcoming sinners of all kinds. We even have a sinner as a pastor.
ReplyDeleteYears ago we adopted "Any friend of Jesus is a Friend of Mine" as a kind of mission statement. On the surface, I suppose we look like a lot of mainline Lutheran churches, but I think that "Friend of Jesus, Friend of mine" think has made a lot of progress sinking in. Now I know you weren't going to debate some of the above, but for what its worth, studying the Bible in context has always proven helpful. Thus, one has to consider the "Holiness Code" of the OT, particularly Leviticus, where stringent prohibitions were sometimes for health or safety but also to keep the Israelites separate as a people and not blend in with the Canaanites etc in the Promised Land. From what we know of the tribes they displaced, sex with anybody or anything had nothing to do with love or fidelity or commitment. It was perversely recreational and as a fertility rite to jumpstart the gods into bringing life back into the earth. St. Paul also has alot of stuff in Romans (curiously, Jesus doesn't) but contextually, one has to consider the role of sexuality in both Greek and Roman cultures, neither of which valued monogamy or fidelity. It was a rite of initiation in the Roman army; among the Greeks, pederasty was simply the thing to do, and among males was used to establish dominance. I don't think you'd find in the Bible that nice gay couple living lives of faithful and loving commitment. I guess I violated the above about not discussing homosexuality per se. And I also ran on a bit, nor do I want to hijack your blog--just wanted to toss a few ideas into the mix, especially about reading the Bible within its cultural context, not to dismiss it but to better understand it.
ReplyDelete